i dunno, go to myspace.com and do a few searches, that fusebox app rarely runs right (or could be the developers) if at all.
---------------------------------------- From: "Damien McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:45 PM To: CF-Talk <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> Subject: RE: Plum vs Adalon? Any web application will be slow on a 486 ;-) Honestly speaking, in today's world of 2ghz machines being considered *low* end I don't think that speed should be the concern it was back when servers were 200MHz. We run lots of Fusebox 3 apps on our server (dual 1ghz xeon) and the only time they're slow is when they query the slow COBOL system. -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014 #include > -----Original Message----- > From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:26 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Plum vs Adalon? > > now when i think of fusebox i think of myspace.com and thats > gotta be the worse performing cfm app i have ever seen. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195337 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
