We have a client that is trying to decide whether to go with my company or another company. We are a CF/MS SQL shop, and the other company does LAMP development (Linux, Apache, MySQL, Perl).
I was wondering if anyone on this list can give some ideas of the pros and cons of using CF/MS SQL vs LAMP. I know for a fact that perl code is harder to read and maintain, and that's it's probably slower since it's interpreted every time instead of pre-compiled as CF is. I know MS SQL has more features (such as stored procs) that MySQL lacks. What other pros does CF/MySQL have over LAMP that might sway a potential client? Personally, except for the fact that LAMP is free, I don't see any advantages of it at all. Thanks, Russ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:208058 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
