I don't think there is any difference in performance, but I do know that I would keep all operations local to the same server than have them go across the network. Depending on your task, the first thing would be to copy any remote files to the local server. Or, the last thing would be to copy local files to the remote server.
Again, this is to keep as much file processing on the local server rather than through network traffic. M!ke -----Original Message----- From: Scott Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 11:13 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: UNC vs Mapped Drive Is there any difference in performance when accessing files on another server between these two methods? The access would be in terms of cffile and some zipping using a java based zip util. Thanks, Scott ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:209316 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
