> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:28 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Ajax and CFCs
> 
> On Monday 15 August 2005 20:12, Jim Davis wrote:
> > 2) Passing structured data once you access them.
> > It's the second bit that gets confusing as hell.
> 
> It's trival to write toXML() methods on all your objects.
> MM even have a query2xml on DevNet.

People that say things are "trivial" annoy me.  ;^P

It IS trivial on the server-side - not so trivial on the client side.

Also it's trivial to write _A_ packet on the server and _A_ consumer on the
client for that one packet... but as you build more and more one-offs it
gets less and less "trivial".

Again (and again and again) what we really need is a decent client-side
parser for common formats.  The only truly common format right now is
SOAP-based web services (although they're still flaky as hell).

IF you had such a library, completely client-side, you could instantly (in
theory) consume web services from nearly all major server-side packages -
most with little to now extra coding.

What we really need is a rich, client-implementable _standard_ for
transmission of structured data over HTTP.  Something that (I think) needs
to be a little more complex than JSON but not as complex as SOAP.  Something
like WDDX could have fit well... but it seems to have withered on the vine.

Jim Davis




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215203
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to