> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:07 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Ajax and CFCs
> 
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 17:27, Jim Davis wrote:
> > It's no slower than any other XML standard.
> 
> It's slower than MM's query2xml, which produces more compact XML.

I was actually talking about the parsing time... I doubt that parsing time
between the two is dramatically difference even tho' WDDX is more verbose.

> The XMl size is important if are are shifting more than a few dozen
> records
> back and forth, and expect enough performance to use it in a key event
> handler.
> 
> Maybe that's just my requirements :-)

If you're shifting simple data and don't care about the data type there's
really nothing more compact that JSON.  It really is an elegant solution to
many problems.

Jim Davis





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215446
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to