> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:07 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Ajax and CFCs > > On Tuesday 16 August 2005 17:27, Jim Davis wrote: > > It's no slower than any other XML standard. > > It's slower than MM's query2xml, which produces more compact XML.
I was actually talking about the parsing time... I doubt that parsing time between the two is dramatically difference even tho' WDDX is more verbose. > The XMl size is important if are are shifting more than a few dozen > records > back and forth, and expect enough performance to use it in a key event > handler. > > Maybe that's just my requirements :-) If you're shifting simple data and don't care about the data type there's really nothing more compact that JSON. It really is an elegant solution to many problems. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215446 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54