Well we won't be doing much administering beyond the initial setup. I am looking more in terms of stability, performance, security and features.
-----Original Message----- From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: IIS 6 VS Apache I would say IIS because I'm more familiar with Windows UI and such. People will swear IIS stinks and Apache rules, but for sheer usability purposes, unless you've done a lot of work in Apache, I'd say IIS is easier to administer. John Burns Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer -----Original Message----- From: Gaulin, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: IIS 6 VS Apache Q: Which are you more comfortable working with/administering? -----Original Message----- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: IIS 6 VS Apache What is the general recommendation now of what to use on Windows Server 2003? Is IIS 6 better then apache, or is apache still the preferred solution for performance, security, etc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:216264 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
