And if you look at the feture set for Standard 2005 compared to standard 2000, you will see they brought some of the enterprise functionality from Enterprise down to standard making it a pretty good deal. Also, MS is going to consider a multi core CPU to count as 1 CPU where as oracle considers each core to count as .75 and rounds it. Sound 1 dual core will count s 2 CPU's and 2 dual core's will count as 3. Big bite for the 1st CPU.
Dan On 8/30/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lee, > > The ability to address more RAM and use more procs - and lots of stuff for > custering/replicating... > .. Like guy at the jaguar dealer said - if you have to ask you can't > afford > it (lol). > > Still beats the cost for the equivelent Oracle server. > > -Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:48 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: SQL Enterprise Cost > > > What is in SQL Server Enterprise version that would > justify the 20K or so more in cost? > > Lee Surma > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:216920 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
