Thanks BB! That's exactly what I needed to prove my point. Barney Boisvert wrote: > That was the case on CF5 and lower, because they did runtime parsing > of the CF, but with CFMX onward, the CF is compiled on the first > request, so the parsing/compiling complexity doesn't have any effect > on subsequent requests. In other words, having one or many CFOUTPUT > tags only affects the initial compilation, which might make the first > request slightly slower, but once it's compiled, there is no > difference. > > cheers, > barneyb > > On 9/8/05, Andy McShane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I was always led to believe that putting cfoutput tags around a whole block >>of code was slower that only putting the tags around the code that you >>wanted output. If I remember correctly it is because the entire code block >>between cfoutput tags has to be parsed and that could mean wasting time on a >>lot of layout code. Not sure if there is a major difference in performance, >>suppose it depends on the amount of code in the block? >> > >
-- ================================================================= Ray Champagne - Senior Application Developer CrystalVision Web Site Design and Internet Services 603.433.9559 www.crystalvision.org ================================================================= ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:217649 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
