Here here!

<!----------------//------
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--------------//--------->

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Image manipulation - Why Macromedia?!


I agree, that's a fair question.  CF's whole purpose is "RAD" and inclusion
of things that make development far easier.  CFGRID is one of those things,
CFGRAPH is one, there could easily be CFIMAGE.  All MM/Adobe needs to do is
buy something like the ImageCR product and integrate it.  I imagine it would
be a great reason in favor up upgrading to the next version.

Matthew Small


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Image manipulation - Why Macromedia?!

I'm not asking CF to provide everything. But this is something that almost
every needs at one point or another. How many people us cfchart compared to
the number of people that would want to manipulate images?

<!----------------//------
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--------------//--------->

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Image manipulation - Why Macromedia?!


It is available in your own language.  ColdFusion is really java, and there
has been code posted in java to do image manipulation.  Anything that could
be done in java could be done in ColdFusion.  If you need something that
performs better, then you go pay for it.  ColdFusion can't possibly include
everything.

Russ

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Image manipulation - Why Macromedia?!

Okay...

This is related to my original post about image manipulation, but is NOT
asking about a specific program.

My question is that since SO MANY people look for image manipulation in
their programming language, why don't more developers add this feature into
their language. Even PHP doesn't have this stuff natively (that I know of)
but does allow you to add it in via extra libraries.

So consider this an open letter to Macromedia/Adobe. Why isn't something
which is so desired by so many people added into your language? I could go
and pay $75 for an excellent codebase (Alagad's Image Component) but doesn't
it make sense to include this into the language itself? I just don't
understand it.

Can anyone enlighten me on this?

<!----------------//------
andy matthews
web developer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--------------//--------->










~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:220355
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to