Hi Michael, Is this one of the opinion questions you ask where you already know your own answer? :)
I'd use the CFSaveContent method, but using CFXml instead of CFSaveContent - works the same, but validates the XML and created an XMLDocument object that can by turned into a string via toString(). -Joe On 10/11/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In running through a shopping cart codebase (cartweaver), I decided to change > a chunk of 40 or so CFSET operations into a single CFSAVECONTENT block. As > this was for building an XML packet, it looked logical to me. No real savings > in code size but to me it just looked cleaner and looked like 'less' > operations. > > Question: What is your preference in such situations. Multiple CFSETs with > each adding a new line of XML to the variable or a block of CFSAVECONTENT > with the entire block wrapped in a CFOUTPUT? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:220656 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54