Hey All, You know it just hit me that CF debugging could be so much more informative in certain situations...and I wonder if anyone can tell me why it isn't?? ;-)
Here's a great example to do with CFCs Pass an argument of type numeric to a method (but the value passed is not numeric). So we get the standard "argument XYZ passed to method ABC is not of type numeric". OK...so at least we know we've passed something inappropriate...but what the heck is so hard about stating what was actually passed!!!??? ;-) In the above situation you then have to go and add a cfdump to see what exactly is getting passed to the method...yet another time waster that on the surface seems pretty dang easy to add to debugging output. OK...rant's over...thanks for listening...and if anyone can explain whyy this would be hard to add...lemme know ;-) Cheers Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. phone: 250.480.0642 fax: 250.480.1264 cell: 250.920.8830 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:222594 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
