Yep, Google indexes them pretty exactly the same as sites with SES url's... which is why I'm glad I never bothered with the whole SES url nonsense... A whole lot of hair-pulling for bupkiss. Plus if you want SES url's, use mod rewrite or isapi rewrite. It's infinitely easier to implement it there than it is to reverse engineer the query string in CF.
> This may well start a big war here, but are dynamic URLs > really a big > problem anymore for todays modern search engine? I have > no evidence > either way, but it seems to me that they must have come up > with some > kind of a workaround by now.... s. isaac dealey 434.293.6201 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234717 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
