On 4/8/06, Paul Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Denny Valliant wrote: > > added it when they added cfdocument, neh? It would be nice if they > > contributed back the code for HTML > PDF. Not that I'm one to talk, > > obviously. You won't find a blog entry documenting my experiences. :-)
i'm not sure what you're referring to. html to pdf is itext & in fact mm did > contribute some fixes, etc. back to the project (cfdocument simplifies > things > immensely) . bruno even pointed that out as an example of the "why & > wherefore" > of opensource's benefiting from commercial projects. mmf mfmmf ffmmfm- excuse me, had a foot in my mouth. Well colour me embarrased, I did not know that. After messing with various HTML > PDF generators, I was really impressed with the cfdocument tag. As I didn't see anything even close to as good as cfdocument, I assumed it was closed-source, so to speak. I'm glad they contributed fixes and didn't just mooch, unlike myself for the most part. I never read bruno and the "why & wherefore". I like the symbiotic relationship that has developed with OS and $$ tho. Sorta bound to happen, if'n ya ask me. There isn't a OS java app that converts html as well as cfdocument does by any chance, is there? If it did flashpaper that would be a plus... ;-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237233 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
