Sorry, I should have been more clear. I meant that the return value (queryname.recordCount) was not useful. Not the count itself.
On 4/18/06, Mike Klostermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't say that. Sometimes it is helpful to know how many records were > updated or deleted without having to do a select query beforehand. Is there > a Java service factory way of getting at this information? > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Wilkerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:22 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Why is there query.recordcount with non-SELECT queries? > > > As I recall, the value gets returned, but always says "0". It's not > useful for anything other than select queries. > > On 4/18/06, Pete Ruckelshaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should queries that do an update return a queryname.recordcount > > variable? I'm trying to determine how many records get changed during > > an update statement. > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238011 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
