I have seen several benefits. It has some extra tags and fucntionality, less bugs, and a smaller footprint if using ServetExec, and the support is better. Plus it runs on .NET :-)
Russ -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Talk <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:37:05 +0100 Subject: Re: BEA licenses BlueDragon for WebLogic > On Monday 17 April 2006 19:37, Vince Bonfanti wrote: > > Some people might also find it significant that BEA is now > essentially a > > competitor to Adobe in a portion of the ColdFusion server market > (that > > "portion" being people who are now or are planning to redeploy > existing > > CFML applications onto WebLogic servers). > > We already run MX on Weblogic. This is a supported configuration and > works > great. > When we last looked, BD was about the same* price for a J2EE version as > MX. It > appears that since then BD has improved it's compatability with legacy > CFML > code since then, however, it's still the same cost with no extra > benefit. > > Don't mind me though, I'm about to change employers :-) > > -- > > Tom Chiverton > Advanced ColdFusion Programmer > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238106 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
