>>I think it's time for you to stop contributing to threads on them since you have no actually looked at any of the code in frameworks.
Wrong, I had to work on an application developed under FB, so I had to learn it. I know enough about it, and other solutions, to be able to say that FB is innecessarily too complex for most applications. >> This thread started as a recomendation on frameworks, not on why not to use them. I'm sorry, but all my messages here where replies to reasons given why to use them, especially FB using XML. If I do not agree with the reason, should I "stop contributing"? >> The poster already uses their own homegrown framework and wanted to branch out to something that has already been developed. I also use my own homegrown framework, and I also looked at "already developed solutions", and IMHO, anyone's own experience in this issue is worth to know, would it be pro or against some ideas about framewortks. Sorry if it gives offence to your convictions. -- _______________________________________ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245306 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
