If you get a VPS you will essentially be a server administrator, as you will need to manage a virtual server. Remotely login and patch/update windows, create sites in IIS etc, do you want that?
If you and your clients want everything nice and simple with a control panel that is provided for you, then just get shared hosting. What option you go for depends on what you want to get out of it, and what thes esites do and how you want them to perform. If they are high traffic, heavy load sites and uptime is very important, then shared hosting may not be the answer. The company I work for offers semi-dedicated as a step up from shared, read about it here: http://www.cfmxhosting.co.uk/index.cfm?action=services.semidedicated Maybe you can find someone in your neck of the woods who do something similar. -- Snake -----Original Message----- From: Matt Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2006 19:13 To: CF-Talk Subject: Hosting Options and Virtual Private Server So I have about 3-4 websites I am looking for a hosting solution for. And the clients are mostly non-profit, so cheaper is gooder. I'm looking for advice as to whether it would be better to just get a separate account for each site, or do something like a Virtual Private Server. I'm not familiar with Linux or Apache, but wouldn't mind learning if this is a good way to go. Any advice is much appreciated. Thanks. -- Matt Williams "It's the question that drives us." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:245810 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
