On 8/4/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good that you've finally decided to price it out more competitively, as
> before I was strongly leaning toward FusionReactor, which is licensed per
> server, not per instance.
>
> One thing that I like better about FusionReactor is that they allow you to
> view past requests, and go and see exactly what sql queries ran, and how
> long each took.  With Seefusion you only get 1 query.
>
> I'm still trying to decide whether we should go with SeeFusion or
> FusionReactor.  Does anyone have any feedback one way or another?  Also do
> the benefits of using the enterprise version of either outweigh the costs?
> We'll have 2-3 servers, with 2 of the servers running 2-3 instances of CF
> each.
>

Russ, one thing to note is that the SeeFusion pricing actually uses
"per server" to really mean "per instance." So if you have the max of
what you said your infrastructure might be (2 servers * 3 instances of
CF), you would have 6 instances times $299, which is $1,794 (assuming
you get the Enterprise license, which would make sense since you're
monitoring multiple instances). Contrast that with FusionReactor,
which is truly licensed per physical server (where you can monitor as
many instances as you like), you'd have 2 servers times $599, which is
$1,198 (again, assuming the Enterprise edition so that you can monitor
multiple instances). That's a $596 savings.

Once you're past the price point, you need to get into a feature
comparison, which I don't fully have mapped out yet.

Regards,
Dave.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:248802
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to