Why is a stats program not good enough? Are you looking for more granularity? I agree with you on the #'s. HTML's run through CF wouldn't have a prob, IMO. It is the same as changing the extension to .cfm.
On 9/2/06, Pete Ruckelshaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are links "in the wild" that are HTML pages that need to be > processed, so if they were changed to .cfm pages, it would generate > 404's. As far as #'s, etc., that would only be an issue for content > that's inside cfoutput tags, which they won't have -- I'm mainly > needing the functionality found in the application.cfm file, which > contains the "sniffer" code. > > Pete > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251869 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4