Why is a stats program not good enough? Are you looking for more
granularity? I agree with you on the #'s. HTML's run through CF wouldn't
have a prob, IMO. It is the same as changing the extension to .cfm.

On 9/2/06, Pete Ruckelshaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are links "in the wild" that are HTML pages that need to be
> processed, so if they were changed to .cfm pages, it would generate
> 404's.  As far as #'s, etc., that would only be an issue for content
> that's inside cfoutput tags, which they won't have -- I'm mainly
> needing the functionality found in the application.cfm file, which
> contains the "sniffer" code.
>
> Pete
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251869
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to