Hi Neil, our Railo Server on our website wich serves up to 60 websites has not been restarted since May 2004 (except for planned maintenance and update reasons). That's when we installed Railo on that server. So I guess the stability of this CFML Server is quite good.
Nevertheless I did not have any larger reasons to complain either concerning MX in this matter. Except for the 6.0 version, 6.1 and 7.0x work just fine. Verity is sometimes a thing to worry about but the rest seems good and stable. Greetings / Grüsse Gert Franz Customer Care Railo Technologies GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.railo.ch Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei: deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/ english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/ Neil Middleton schrieb: > Bit of an odd one this - but does anyone else find CF a little more > "unreliable" than other similar products when using them in day to day use. > > The only reason I ask is that our CF servers always seem a little more > unstable than some of our other servers running things such as ASP.NET or > Ruby on Rails. CF just seems to restart itself more than I believe it > should. > > I am the only one? I'm pretty sure our code is fairly sound, and that our > servers aren't under too much load. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253226 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
