I'll see if I can find out for you Charilie. :o) Charlie Griefer wrote: > Do you know if the code was from a recent version of MX? > > I'm pretty sure that even as of MX 6, <cfscript> was faster...and you > could see in the decompiled code why (as you mention below). However, > I believe that as of MX 6.1 (and onward), that was no longer the case. > > I could be wrong, so I'm curious to know what CF platform these tests > were conducted on. > > On 12/18/06, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jon, >> >> I just posted that so you'd know where I got my information. Phillip >> *has* actually decompiled the JIT code and seen that for complex >> examples that CFScript is faster, because it's closer in resemblance to >> the byte code that ColdFusion ultimately parses. Phillip just stated >> better than I could have. >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:264378 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
