From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
>
> I'm going to turn this on it's head.
>
> You're right - there's a big difference between COM and CFX. If Allaire was
> going to expend resources on this issue, though, I'd much prefer them to
> extend their COM implementation, which frankly isn't too hot. I'd like to
> know that I could use an ASP component with CF without testing it first. I'd
> like to be able to reference object hierarchies, and use non-string
> datatypes, and take advantage of MTS transactional ability.
>
When CF 5.0 what then extensions?
Classes to toolbox we add?
Pan-yoda {degree english have also}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
