From: "Owens, Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Priority 0, errors that I find. (Not superseding the above list,
> >rather supersetting it.)
>
> Well, yeah ...
>
> But I've found that no matter how hard I try and plan and test,
> invariably a user thinks of some way to use an application that I hadn't
> anticipated. That usually causes an error. It's a given that we should debug
> our own apps first, but it's probably impossible to anticipate every single
> stupid thing a user might do (or some times smart things that lead toward
> new functionality).
>
I'm not disagreeing with you. My point is that whilst including *lots* of
idiot-proofing code was once 'normal' coding practice, now it seems that
people just do the RAD.
Besides, I reserve a certain aspect of self that is quite like an idiot user
and thus it is easy to look at code from that p.o.v.
Pan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
