This was more my reasoning, less memory and as the sites numbers grow I can potentially see a large benefit.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Scott To: CF-Talk Sent: Wed Apr 25 08:30:06 2007 Subject: Re: Server or Application scope for a set if common components Neil, I don't believe there will be any problems with that, never done anything like that before but I would consider it safe and handles less memory than if it was in each application. On 4/25/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, > > We have a group of CFC's which currently exist in the application scope of > each website (and there will be hundreds of these sites) we publish from > our > CMS. Now, these CFC's are common across all sites so I was thinking of > moving these common objects across to the server scope. While this makes > sense from a shared object perspective, I am not sure if there will be any > huge impact as far as memory / performance is concerned and obviously want > to be sure before any code changes take place. > > In a nutshell it will a case of instantiating 10+ objects multiplied by X > number of sites or 10+ objects once - seems fairly obvious the benefit > when > you write it our like that :-) > > We own the network so access/manipulation of these scopes is not an issue. > > Cheers > > N > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please > note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or > call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within > this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Macromedia ColdFusion MX7 Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:276186 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
