As far as test server and production server go, you can export from SVN or
File sync with beyond compare.

On 5/15/07, AJ Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe I need a test branch too
>
> In dev I can use switch to jump between bug001 and bug002 say
> Once I am happy with it I can merge that into the test branch - along with
> all the other developer bug fixes.
>
> Then  test server can be updated from the test branch
>
> I will still merge bug001 into truck once it is signed off
> and not merger test branch with trunk as there are still bug fixes in
> testing
>
> Would just need to ensure all branches are kept upto date with the trunk.
>
> On 5/15/07, AJ Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I mean deploy.
> >
> > So, some how, I go from my dev box, to the test server then finally to
> the
> > production server.
> > Other developers will also deploy to the test server.
> >
> > As I understand it, we wont want to commit anything to the trunk until
> it
> > has been signed off in test.
> >
> > So in that case, if trunk is always stable, we can just update the
> > production server from the trunk.
> > This makes that side very simple. And that being the most important part
> -
> > that is a good thing :-)
> > And I guess at that same time the trunk can be tagged - eg
> > /tags/prod-20070515
> >
> > Now I am just left with the bit in between all the dev servers and the
> > test server.
> > Branching seems to me the way to go for major bug fixes and new
> features.
> > Ensuring an mods to the truck get merged into the branches then updated
> > into the dev machine(s)
> > Then, to my thinking, once the bug has been signed off in test, I should
> > be able to merge it into the trunk.
> >
> > Hmmm, time to do some testing and see what happens...
> >
> > On 5/15/07, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Deploy? If you mean deploy to production, thats always trunk.
> > >
> > > Or do you mean deploy from your code to the repository, that's commit.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/15/07, AJ Mercer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK, irrespective of whether the trunk or branches are used
> > > > how do you selectively chose what you want to deploy?
> > > >
> > > > If I have 5 bug fixes on the go bug001 - bug005,
> > > > and bug004 is signed off
> > > > how would I use subversion to know which files need to be updated on
> > > > production (without any of the work on bugs 1,2,3,5 going over)?
> > > >
> > > > On 5/15/07, Andrew Scott < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > AJ,
> > > > >
> > > > > Welcome to the world of many ways to skin a cat.
> > > > >
> > > > > We do it the same way I outlined a few times now, but others have
> > > > diffeent
> > > > > ways to do it.
> > > > >
> > > > > When working on something that is either new or a bug, the code is
> > > > looked
> > > > > at
> > > > > and fixed now until it is fixed, tested with unit tests and the
> > > > > development
> > > > > tested we do not commit it back to SVN.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thats our procedure, but as I said earlier, we also sync the
> changes
> > > to
> > > > > make
> > > > > sure we don't need to merge any new code, and then when its
> tested,
> > > > merged
> > > > > on our code with the repository we then commit it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thats our method, and others have many other ways of doing it.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> If you are not living on the edge,
> You are taking up too much space.
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJQ 

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:278225
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to