And if we are going to compare Web Service features - CF makes automatic documentation for web services. That's probably just as useful as a test page. :)
On 7/31/07, Charles E. Heizer1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The .Net development not only creates the web service but it also creates > WSDL and a Test page to test the web service. Which is really slick compared > to what CF produces. I've also found the web service code generated by CF > does not include the proper header info, which has caused some application > developers a headache consuming some of the web services. > > > > On 7/30/07 6:06 PM, "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/31/07, Charles E. Heizer1 wrote: > >I just recently started playing with Visual Studio .Net, and it's far > easier to write web services and create great web content. > > How is the .NET code for a webservice easier than writing access="remote"? > > -- > mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: > http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the answers you are looking for on the ColdFusion Labs Forum direct from active programmers and developers. http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid-72&catid=648 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:284971 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
