On 8/21/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That wikipedia ROCKS!
Don't believe everything you read on wikipedia - it's descriptions of some design patterns are pitiful, for example. > Seems like the most plausible way to get that kind of > "coverage" is through Test Driven Design The point of code coverage is *measurability*. By definition, you get better coverage by having better tests but that's irrelevant to the process of figuring out the *amount* of coverage. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:286794 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
