Thanks for the clarification, and that makes sense. Perhaps more to the
point though, what happens if you change the actual instance data that your
CFC contains (adding or removing a pointer to another component for
instance)? I would assume that this will indeed cause things to break,
correct?

On Dec 13, 2007 1:09 AM, Rakshith N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Brian,
>        Though a valid concern, just wanted to make it clear that the
> deserialized cfc will not go out of sync when a new method is added
> while it was serialized. This is because, the methods are never
> serialized. It's only the instance level data associated with the cfc
> instance, such as the variables in the this scope and in the var scope
> of the cfc, that get serialized. The methods are always available in the
> cfc template. Hence, the methods are not serialized.
>
> So, once the cfc instance is back into action when it is deserialized,
> the new methods will be available to the cfc from the .cfc template.
>
> The best part about CFC serialization is it can handle complex circular
> references as well. That is, if a cfc has a reference back to the itself
> in the this scope, then you can expect the same circular reference to be
> maintained once the cfc is deserailized.
>
> And yes, we are working on the serializing array and query objects
> within the cfc scopes. That issue will be fixed soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Rakshith
> Adobe ColdFusion Team
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 8:47 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF8: Serialise a CFC?
>
> Also, be very careful because if you have serialized versions of CFCs in
> the
> database and then you change the actual code for the CFC (add a method,
> etc.), you are going to have major problems because your application
> code
> will be out of synch with the serialized CFCs. Which means if you add a
> method and then deserialize the CFC, at best any code in your app that
> uses
> the new method will blow up when it hits your out-of-synch deserialized
> CFC,
> and at worst it might not even deserialize at all.
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 4:03 PM, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From what I also understand, serialisation is a deep serialisation, so
> > be careful with your composition, as you have no control over how deep
> > the serialisation goes (which is unfortunate, but workaroundable)
> >
> > That all being said, there is no reason you couldn't roll your own
> > serialisation Mike, WDDX, or something of your own making.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 3:51 AM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Even if CF8 can serialize CFCs (I've read that it can), I
> > > > don't think you can store complex variables in the Client
> > > > scope. I'd assume that a serialized CFC would be considered
> > > > a complex variable.
> > >
> > > No, it's a string. The example in the URL I included writes the
> string
> > to a
> > > file.
> > >
> > > There is a serious limitation to this, though - your CFC can only
> > contain
> > > strings, structures and other CFC instances apparently. If it
> contains
> > > arrays or queries, you can't deserialize it again! Apparently,
> Adobe's
> > > working on fixing that.
> > >
> > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> > > http://www.figleaf.com/
> > >
> > > Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
> > > instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
> > > Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location.
> > > Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:294698
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to