Exactly. So I think the basic message should be: be very careful about storing serialized components for very long because it is very easy for the serialized versions to become out of synch with your actual CFC code.
On Dec 14, 2007 2:16 AM, Rakshith N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since all the instance level data will be serialized, the deserailized > instance should regain the exact state of the instance before it was > serialized. However, if the data in either the THIS scope or the > VARIABLES scope is modified while the data was serialized, the modified > data will not be available in the deserialized instance. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 9:43 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF8: Serialise a CFC? > > Thanks for the clarification, and that makes sense. Perhaps more to the > point though, what happens if you change the actual instance data that > your > CFC contains (adding or removing a pointer to another component for > instance)? I would assume that this will indeed cause things to break, > correct? > > On Dec 13, 2007 1:09 AM, Rakshith N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Brian, > > Though a valid concern, just wanted to make it clear that the > > deserialized cfc will not go out of sync when a new method is added > > while it was serialized. This is because, the methods are never > > serialized. It's only the instance level data associated with the cfc > > instance, such as the variables in the this scope and in the var scope > > of the cfc, that get serialized. The methods are always available in > the > > cfc template. Hence, the methods are not serialized. > > > > So, once the cfc instance is back into action when it is deserialized, > > the new methods will be available to the cfc from the .cfc template. > > > > The best part about CFC serialization is it can handle complex > circular > > references as well. That is, if a cfc has a reference back to the > itself > > in the this scope, then you can expect the same circular reference to > be > > maintained once the cfc is deserailized. > > > > And yes, we are working on the serializing array and query objects > > within the cfc scopes. That issue will be fixed soon. > > > > Thanks, > > Rakshith > > Adobe ColdFusion Team > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Kotek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 8:47 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CF8: Serialise a CFC? > > > > Also, be very careful because if you have serialized versions of CFCs > in > > the > > database and then you change the actual code for the CFC (add a > method, > > etc.), you are going to have major problems because your application > > code > > will be out of synch with the serialized CFCs. Which means if you add > a > > method and then deserialize the CFC, at best any code in your app that > > uses > > the new method will blow up when it hits your out-of-synch > deserialized > > CFC, > > and at worst it might not even deserialize at all. > > > > On Dec 12, 2007 4:03 PM, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > From what I also understand, serialisation is a deep serialisation, > so > > > be careful with your composition, as you have no control over how > deep > > > the serialisation goes (which is unfortunate, but workaroundable) > > > > > > That all being said, there is no reason you couldn't roll your own > > > serialisation Mike, WDDX, or something of your own making. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > On Dec 13, 2007 3:51 AM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Even if CF8 can serialize CFCs (I've read that it can), I > > > > > don't think you can store complex variables in the Client > > > > > scope. I'd assume that a serialized CFC would be considered > > > > > a complex variable. > > > > > > > > No, it's a string. The example in the URL I included writes the > > string > > > to a > > > > file. > > > > > > > > There is a serious limitation to this, though - your CFC can only > > > contain > > > > strings, structures and other CFC instances apparently. If it > > contains > > > > arrays or queries, you can't deserialize it again! Apparently, > > Adobe's > > > > working on fixing that. > > > > > > > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > > > > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > > > > > > > Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized > > > > instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, > > > > Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your > location. > > > > Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:294770 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
