> From a SEO perspective which is better: ... I don't think it'll make any difference what you do in those three cases.
In general, what works well for SEO is what works well for users. "SEO-friendly" URLs are also more user-friendly. Since search engines don't release their algorithms, and they're constantly changing said algorithms, the best you can generally do is to provide good, well-organized, user-friendly content. The "SEO specialists", for the most part, are a lot like shamans divining the future from entrails. Alternatively, you can spend a lot of time examining how your competitors' pages work, and then do what they're doing. Of course, you have to revisit this quite frequently, as what works well changes. You might find this useful, although it's a bit dated: http://figleaf.mmalliance.acrobat.com/seo/ Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Training: Adobe/Google/Paperthin Certified Partners http://training.figleaf.com/ WebManiacs 2008: the ultimate conference for CF/Flex/AIR developers! http://www.webmaniacsconference.com/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:299361 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
