I wouldn't call that a pseudo constructor. I do realise thats what has been adopted, does it make it right. No I don't believe so.
Because technically it is not.... I do know that is what people are saying, and for the life of me I do not know why. Consider this then.. <cfcomponent> ..... Set some local variables ..... Some private and public methods. </cfcomponent> By such definition, if we instantiate the above code and the cfcomponent is a pseudo constructor. Then by that same definition we would then have to say that the methods are now a nested class. just because Coldfusion doesn't have a constructor by default, doesn't mean we should make it more confusing than it already is. i understand why people are thinking this way, but I don't believe it should continue in that manner either. Just my opinion. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, he means the pseudo constructor, before and outside of any of the > methods within Application.cfc. > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Scott > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > pseudo constructor? > > > > I think, you mean defined as local variables to that component. > > -- > mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: > http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:304387 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
