>>Any date-picker should be fine, provided that the widget is used to populate a text field that can also be manually entered.
Thanx Ike, So if I understand correctly, if I have a date/time widgets that can can be used as (or considered to be) a convenience or an adjunct, but not the primary and/or only means to entering the date/time, then I will be fine? That is the part I am not clear on. >> I integrated the Dynarch widget into the onTap framework last year. Huh... Small world. I have a custom tag for the Dynarch widget that was hoping to leverage. Do you think that the Dynarch widget will be ok? Thanx G! On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM, s. isaac dealey <i...@turnkey.to> wrote: > > > Also.. Does anyone know of any 508 compliant date/time pickers? Those > > are going to be the only JS widgets that may be an issue. > > Any date-picker should be fine, provided that the widget is used to > populate a text field that can also be manually entered. I integrated > the Dynarch widget into the onTap framework last year. > > -- > s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch > isn't it time for a change? > ph: 817.385.0301 > > http://onTap.riaforge.org/blog > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:319639 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
