http://groups.google.com/group/openbd/browse_thread/thread/a9da36320b64d5d6
:-D That being said it's worth mentioning that without large amounts of re-engineering Railo and ColdFusion will have a harder time running in the AppEngine mostly due to how they compile CFML. Adam On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Brad Wood <b...@bradwood.com> wrote: > > From: "Barney Boisvert" <bboisv...@gmail.com> > > Out of the box, I doubt any of the CFML engines follow the AppEngine > > rules, > > While I think it would be cool to run CFML on Google's App engine, I think > one of the major hurdles would be files system access. Log files, temp > directories, and even cached class files would all have to be refactored. > And according to the docs, any running program wouldn't even be allowed to > open a socket connection. > > http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/whatisgoogleappengine.html > "For instance, bytecode that attempts to open a socket or write to a file > will throw a runtime exception" > > I think you'd have to use all of Google's APIs to do all that stuff. > CFMAIL > would be out in favor of the JavaMail API. Seems like a lot of that would > be a step backwards from the basic stuff ColdFusion already does for us. > Either way, unless Adobe REALLY wanted to rearrange CF to fit that mold, I > think an open source project like Railo or OpenBD would have to take up the > mantle of making a CFML engine that followed the Googles App sandbox rules. > > ~Brad > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:321533 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
