Brilliant - I'll be downloading that and plugging it in to my fusebox custom cache verb. Should be a snap :) One thing I have done in Fusebox is to create two custom verbs (I initially wrote caching into the core but figured a more pluggable way to do it):
<cache> (works kinda like cfcache) and <no-cache>. I came up with the no-cache solution when trying to cache whole pages and quickly realising why that wouldn't work well because of little spots in pages that couldn't be cached. I then went around caching every element of the page individually but that started causing real headaches. The cleanest solution for me was to add the <no-cache> verb, that allows you to cache like this: <fuseaction name="fubar"> <cache agent="myPageCacheAgent"> <do action="someFuseaction" /> <do action="someOtherFuseaction" /> </cache> </fuseaction> <fuseaction name="someFuseaction"> <no-cache> <include template="noncacheablecontent" /> </no-cache> </fuseaction> <fuseaction name="someFuseaction"> <include template="cacheablecontent" /> </fuseaction> Under the hood, this will cache everything between the cache tags. However, when the no-cache tag is encountered an html comment is wrapped around the content. When the cached content is output, this commented code is replaced by the output of doing the non cacheable fuseaction (the fuseaction name is embedded in the comment). Anyways, thought I'd mention that as I have found this approach incredibly useful. Dom 2009/9/10 s. isaac dealey <i...@turnkey.to> > > Hi all, > > I just wanted to let everyone know that I've just released an 0.9 beta > of the new CacheBox caching framework. Hopefully it will be a release > candidate soon enough. > > Matt Gersting was also working on a similar project called FuseCache > specifically for FuseBox applications and we're talking now about how to > integrate those. You can tell from the release number that we're not > quite finished yet. I'd also like to talk with folks from other framework > communities like the ColdBox or Mach-II communities about integration > that would allow people to choose between CacheBox and the existing > cache features in those frameworks. > > I posted a blog about the release with my release notes that mention the > things that still need to be written, enhanced or fixed. You can read > the blog here: > > http://cachebox.riaforge.org/blog/index.cfm/2009/9/9/Version-09-BETA > > And of course you can download the zip archive at > http://cachebox.riaforge.org > > Thanks guys, I'm looking forward to hearing your feedback. :) > > -- > s. isaac dealey ^ new epoch > isn't it time for a change? > ph: 817.385.0301 > > http://onTap.riaforge.org/blog > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:326188 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
