On 3/9/2010 1:20 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: >> you can also do a<cfhttp...> with a timeout value of 0. >> > Much easier. Any drawbacks? I don't need any values back from the request, > I just need it to run. >
Other than it is much more limited in capabilities then the modern <cfthread...> equivalent, if it meets your needs within its limitations the is nothing wrong with the technique. Just realize that there is *zero* way to know what the results of the abandon request was, so if it is throwing errors or not doing what it is supposed to be doing, it is not going to be telling you of its problems. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:331502 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
