> You still didn't answer the question. What is the version number of > the JVM being used? This is very important. Anything less than 1.6. > 0_10 is going to have performance issues. >
Hi Wil, In regards the JVM version, the original version I saw was 1.6.0_17. I changed it to use the Adobe distribution version for CF 8.0.0, which got me 1.6.0_01 and that had a 3 second better performance than the original, on the original code that utilised <cffile>. Now on that same 1.6.0_01 JVM version, with calls to java.io.filewriter replacing those to cffile, I get run times of 8 seconds (10x faster). Finally, I change the JVM version back to 1.6.0_17 and I get a run time of 12 seconds. So I conclude that unexpectedly, the older version of JVM is faster doing file io than the newer version, and of course java.io.Filewriter is faster than <cffile> <go figure...!> Unfortunately I am unable to spend further time on this, but again, thanks for your involvement and contribution. I will post the cfc encapsulating the calls to java.io.filewriter under separate cover for those that want it. Nothing special but might save someone some time. Cheers, Bryn ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:338313 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
