David, IT makes no difference which you use as far a performance is concerned, at least not that I have noticed. I actually prefer to use cfinvoke for readability. You can also make it stateful just as easy using cfinvoke simply by putting it in application scope, then do a search an replace on your code and replace "componentname" with #application.myvar# in all the cfinvokes.
Russ -----Original Message----- From: David McGraw [mailto:david.mcg...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 October 2010 15:47 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: OOP vs cfinvoke Not 100% sure, but cfinvoke only calls a method, which in theory has to load the object. When you create the object vs CreateObject in cfscript, and then call multiple methods based on that one loading command, you should see improved performance. Regards, David McGraw Oyova Software - http://www.oyova.com On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Sisk, Kris <ks...@gckschools.com> wrote: > > I've got an app here that has several hundred cfinvoke calls to a > couple of CFCs. I'm trying to decide if it's worth my time to go > through and convert the app from using cfinvoke constantly to using > cfobject. How much of a difference on my overhead will it make? > > > > Kris Sisk > > USD-457 Technology > > 1205 Fleming St. > > Garden City, KS 67846 > > (620) 805-7107 > > > > There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand > binary and those who don't. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:338479 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
