The only abuse I've seen from Adobe<http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=For%20all%20intensive%20purposes>was abuse of the English language.
/me runs On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Brian Kotek <brian...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What are we actually debating, again? The original issue at the root of all > this was that Adobe is being "abusive" to the OSS engines. Highlighting the > competitive advantages that Adobe feels they have over Railo or OpenBD, or > the negative impact they feel it those engines have on the Adobe or CF > community, is not abuse. It is exactly what competitors do. Everyone is > free > to agree or disagree with what Adobe is saying. But to call it "abuse" > reveals, at best, a lack of understanding of what the word means, and at > worst, an intentional misrepresentation. > > I keep asking for some examples of the horrible abuse that Adobe (or > anyone, > really) are directing at the OSS engines, but no one seems to be bothering > to provide any. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:341746 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
