Of course, a measure on single hits is not a good measure of the performance impact. You might be happyish adding a 200ms average at peak load to a high traffic site - but who knows what the real impact is without a proper performance test / pushing it live and hoping...
Dominic On 13 June 2011 16:57, Russ Michaels <r...@michaels.me.uk> wrote: > > LOL, ok well perhaps I am just used to see much worse loading times on most > peoples sites. > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Peter Boughton <bought...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > 200ms is still a good page load time. >> Not when the original was 20ms! >> >> A page that takes 0.2s to load is no longer "instant", there's a detectable >> delay, which isn't good. >> >> >> >> Does it really take 145ms to check for SQL Injection? :/ >> >> What's it doing that takes that long!? >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:345240 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
