> > Just for kicks, I tested this in TextEdit, TextWrangler, and MS Word for > Mac 2011 >
Ug. Mac. Now it makes sense. You likely also think black turtle necks are fashionable. > Anyway, if you feel intimidated by your spellchecker, perhaps you have > issues that go beyond this discussion. > :) I see you've got a keen sense of humour Dave. Not to be outdone by your ability to spot sarcasm. > Sure, and in any case I'm not inclined to take presentation advice > from someone who thinks words come from dictionaries. Sure Dave, that's neither here nor there. Continue on your path, it seems comfortable. I'll note that you didn't answer the question I asked earlier, though - what > word > would you use in its place? You're right Dave. I did miss that. What would I use in it's place? In the context that it's used in the original statement here? Or in the context of what all the dictionary references that have been posted? The "evidence" given to prove the existence of "truthiness" (there's that squiqqle again in Chrome) in no way relates to Truthy and Falsy, so if we're talking about the original statement I wouldn't replace it, I'd just use it correctly. If we're talking about the way it's cited in the "evidence" then I'd replace it perhaps with instinct, strong hunch, belief or intuition. There's another five minutes I'll never get back. I'm such a sucker for Troll bait. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348141 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
