Yep. That sounds familiar. And some of the auto incrementing features in access 
don't convert well. Perhaps a more recent conversion package version does a 
better job these days. This was about 9 years ago. 

Ben

> On Nov 5, 2013, at 8:20 AM, Russ Michaels <r...@michaels.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> Microsoft provide a free migration tool, as you are obviously on windows I
> would suggest going with MSSQL and not MySQL
> http://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/download/details.aspx?id=28763
> 
> the code changes are fairly minimal unless your app is huge, but if memory
> serves it is mainly issues with primary keys and TEXT fields to varchar
> fields you will have to deal with.
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ben <b...@webworldinc.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Russ
>> 
>> For those of us who have been out of the loop for a while, can you suggest
>> easy to implement alternatives to 32 bit MS access? I did a conversion of a
>> DB to SQL server some years back and that was painful.
>> 
>> Ben
>> 
>>> On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Russ Michaels <r...@michaels.me.uk> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> well someone has to say it...
>>> but why the frack are you still using MSACCESS when there are so many
>>> better/free alternatives?
>>> you know the Jet driver (which is what you use to connect to MSACCESS) is
>>> no longer supported by Microsoft and ha snot been for years and only runs
>>> in 32 bit, and as such does not work on modern 64bit OS (without lots of
>>> hacking to get it to run in 32bit mode), which is Windows Server 2008
>>> onwards, there is no 32 bit windows any more.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, <> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>> I have robot updaters and inserters too (made all the more robotic
>> with
>>>> the
>>>> help of cfdbinfo figuring out the field types),
>>>> 
>>>> This is what I do, but using my own CFX_ODBCinfo I developped years
>> before
>>>> cfdbinfo was available,
>>>> and I'm still using it because cfdbinfo doesn't work for Access
>> databases.
>>>> 
>>>>>> Debugging is miserable with a layer of
>>>> code in the middle and straightforward without.
>>>> 
>>>> Right, I think I'm going to improve my CF_INSERT tag by generating the
>> SQL
>>>> code in the tag.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:357042
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to