Copyright crap again... all these projections and protections are
laughable...
I brought up the point before about folks using others code base as the
origin of their project... Face it we all started somewhere... Cold
Fusion isn't a compiled language so inherently, it is less secure to
protect code... However, I can disassemble anything down to machine
code if I am a purist and figure it out...
Telling people not to decrypt is incredibly dumb and shows the lack of
reality breadth in legislation... Some of the best things happen
because of people creativity and ability to modify the simple into the
stellar...
And for anyone that steals your code verbatim, good luck trying to
prove it is yours... I have had folks borrow mine plenty times.. Most
of us can't afford the legal retainer let alone the suit...
-paris
[finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:10:11 EDT
Subject: Re: Intellectual Property (warning)
> Encrypting code grants one addition protection under chapture 12 of
> the
> Copyright Act. Encryption would be considered a software protection
> mechcanism and circumvention could result in procesuction under the
> NET act
> ($500,000 fine and 3 years?) or additional civil action beside
> straight
> copyright infringement.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
> In a message dated 8/20/01 3:03:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > Encrypting code merely makes it
> > inconvenient to some one who wants to make mods or steal some bits
> or
> > pieces.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
