> Is it just me, or does it seem like Raymond almost has a chip on his
> shoulder? Every response in this thread he seems agitated or defensive
> about something...
Sorry, but what about what I said below is rude? The only time I've gotten
agitated here is when people were advocating decrypting templates, and hey,
we all have things we get agitated about. ;) Again, though, I don't see
where I was rude below, but if I was, I apologize. Just trying to help.
(Although, I _still_ say it is a mistake to use unofficial functions and
then complain about it, but the original poster said this wasn't his
choice.)
-Ray
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:07 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: Encryption differences in ColdFusion 4.5 and 5.0?
> >
> >
> > > > So, the problems were with the unofficial funcs? If so, I'm
> not going
> > > to
> > > > worry about them. Again, if you don't use the official
> funcs, you reap
> > > what
> > > > you sow. ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
