As one of those three, I agree. I responded in haste to the simple problem
of evaluating variables within (simple) variables, ignoring the struct
aspect of the problem.
Jason
>From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: CFWDDX problem
>Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:19:06 -0400
>
>No, no no. Please do not use evaluate. Please use [] notation.
>
>Again, this is not meant to put you down, Mike, in any way, but as I
>said, I see _way_ too many people doing this. In fact, 3 people replied
>to cf-talk suggesting evaluate. Never use evaluate when you don't need
>to.
>
>=======================================================================
>Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia
>
>Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
>"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> >
> > > <cfwddx action="CFML2WDDX" output="UserDataPacket"
> > > input="#evaluate('application.um.' & UmID & '_Data')#">
> >
> > might help you out.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 20 September 2001 13:49
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: CFWDDX problem
> > >
> > >
> > > CFWDDX problem.. What do I do about this? I want to turn a
> > > struct into a
> > > WDDX packet, but the name of the struct is dymanic, based on
> > > the user id.
> > >
> > >
> > > The struct is called: application.um.#UmID#_Data
> > >
> > > and the CFWDDX tag is as follows:
> > >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
