No problem. BTW, Looks like I typed too fast, couple errors in my post:
"this way" instead of "this was" and "machine without error" instead of "machine with error" > Thanks Tony, > > Thats pretty much what I had presumed > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23 November 2001 14:19 > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Load balancing with hardware solution - still require > > Enterprise? > > > > > > No, you don't need lb/failover services of Enterprise with a hardware load > > balancer... > > > > At my last big site we used a Foundry lb with several webservers. If you > > use session variables, be sure to use the datasource method rather than > > registry - this was a user can pass from machine to machine without issue. > > > > We setup each machine to mount a shared webroot from a fileserver, so that > > there were no code "distribution" issues, all machines used the same > > webroot. Also, each machine was addressable at its own unique hostname, > > but since the load balancer answered as "www", we were able to use the > > same ssl certificate (www.domain.com) on each machine with error (unless > > you hit it with its hostname specifically). > > > > > I was wondering if I passed the job of load balancing to a third party > > > hardware solution, do I still need to use Enterprise? > > > > > > TIA, > > > Dave > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
