> Anybody have anything good or bad to say regarding CFXGraphicsServer? > (Other than the fact that charging $450 for a localhost version should > make TeraTech feel guilty on their way to the bank.)
Why should the localhost NOT cost a whack, considering it does shed-loads more than CFGraph Think about it this way, if the local server version cost less, all you'd do is get the page that requests the making of the graphic to get the server-run page to build them, that way it might take a couple of seconds more, but you could make "permanent" graphs at a fraction of the cost... Does that seem fair to Teratech? I'm not defending the cost, but I can still see why it's not REALLY cheap Philip Arnold Technical Director Certified ColdFusion Developer ASP Multimedia Limited T: +44 (0)20 8680 1133 F: +44 (0)20 8686 7911 An ISO9001 registered company. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ********************************************************************** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
