Some may not like the way I use one implementation of WDDX, but it works really well with variable databases...
Here is an article on an "other" way to use WDDX. http://www.quilldesign.com/developer/knowledge.cfm?mode=view&owner=209D3EA7- 3585-4DF0-A2C0DE72865FF804 It's not for everyone, but it might perk some thoughts! Paul Giesenhagen QuillDesign http://www.quilldesign.com SiteDirector - Commerce Builder > > I'm not sure if this is OT or not but here goes... > > > > Why would I use WDDX instead of just using straight XML? > > -there are SEVERAL good parsers out there. > > -The javascript that it takes to create the "packets" is not that > complex. > > -The "packets" aren't really any kind of packets their just strings > that > are parsed...XML? > > and more... > > > > I actually am interested in using it and I have no direct quams with > using > WDDX but why would I use it when we have an XML framework already > built for other applications? > > > > Thanks- > > Savan > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusiona FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
