oi Timothy!! w3rd up!
-- Critz Certified Adv. ColdFusion Developer Crit[s2k] - <CF_ChannelOP Network="Efnet" Channel="ColdFusion"> ------------------------------------ Monday, April 29, 2002, 11:31:04 AM, you wrote: TH> I would say tht UDF's alone were a good enough reason to go to CF 5. I love TH> em and use em all the time :) TH> Tim Heald TH> ACP/CCFD :) TH> Application Development TH> www.schoollink.net >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matthew R. Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:30 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) >> >> >> So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 people using CF >> at once on an intranet application, (I also use CF from a shared host) >> there is no advantage to going to MX? I'm still waiting for a great >> reason to upgrade to CF 5.0. >> >> - Matt Small >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:11 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) >> >> Yup, you're right. Well in that case on with the ensuing flame war. >> >> First the caveats; CFMX has not been tuned for performance yet according >> to MM. >> >> With that aside, I have been working with Neo since the alpha days and >> have seen it change quite a bit since then. During that time I have >> learned that CFMX will have a performance threshold very close to that >> of JSP. For those of you who don't know, JSP doesn't actually perform >> that well. On a single server, a properly built CF 5 application would >> blow away a properly built JSP application. This is a fact that can be >> easily proved today. However, JSP is more scalable than CF 5. This is an >> important distinction depending on what type of load your application is >> planning on supporting. If you are a shared hosting provider, you will >> be able to support less web applications on the same server than with CF >> 5. If you maintain a small site that only uses a single server, you will >> need more server resources to provide the same level of performance you >> are used today with CF 5. >> >> With all that being said, if you currently run a web application that >> depends on more than one CF server, CFMX is going to be great. Using >> J2EE, you will be able to partition your application on top different >> servers to increase its scalability. With a properly built CFMX >> application you will be able to simply add more servers as needed. >> >> -Matt >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:44 AM >> > To: CF-Talk >> > Subject: RE: CF MX >> > >> > Jump over to the Neo forums on the beta site - Libby English of >> > Macromedia : "You can now discuss all aspects of the new CF >> release..." >> > >> > --- >> > Billy Cravens >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM >> > To: CF-Talk >> > Subject: RE: CF MX >> > >> > That information is NDA at this point. >> > >> > -Matt >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM >> > > To: CF-Talk >> > > Subject: CF MX >> > > >> > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them >> to >> > > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows >> the >> > > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? >> > > >> > > >> > > Bill Wheatley >> > > Senior Database Developer >> > > Ediets.com >> > > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer >> > > 954.360.9022 X159 >> > > >> > >> > >> >> TH> ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
