Because there is a standard involved. Accessing the below web service from and ASP application is almost as easy as setting it up in CF. Since you mentioned cfhttp though....how about CFMX being the first version of CF with a decent HTTP client. I thought it ironic that UPS was mentioned in the CF MX press release, but I'll be damned if I can get cfhttp in 5.0 to talk to their XML gateway...
jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew R. Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:34 PM Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > How is this different than calling a CFM page via cfhttp? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:01 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > ColdFusionMX components. > > create the code once and then call it from: > > 1. Cold Fusion pages > 2. other components > 3. Flash via flash remoting > 4. anywhere on the internet via web services. > > for example: > > helloWorld.cfc > > <cfcomponent> > > <cffunction name="sayHello" access="remote"> > > <cfreturn "Hello World " /> > > </cffunction> > > </cfcomponent> > > then call it like so: > > helloWorld.cfc?wsdl > > voila, instant web service. > > mike chambers > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
