Well you're welcome to disagree of course, but my applications were getting sub 50ms with CF 5 almost a year ago. Just putting them on newer hardware would lower the number even further.
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:26 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > I disagree. The more distributed the web world becomes, the more that > performance will become THE issue. Every millisecond becomes important > when > your biggest battle is already network latency. > > -mk > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:52 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > It's a great goal, but have a look at the other folks in the J2EE world > who have been at it a long time. Again, on a single server, a properly > built CF 5 application is going to out perform one built on top of JRun, > WebSphere, iPlanet, or WebLogic. I doubt seriously that MM has some leg > up on the rest of the J2EE vendors in terms of performance. > > This is all a moot point really though. Unless you don't know how to > code, every application server from CF 5 to J2EE is plenty fast enough. > Scalability is simply not the issue it was back in the day, see my > editorial over at Evolt.org, > http://www.evolt.org/article/Scalability_s_New_Meaning/21/23896/index.ht > ml. > > -Matt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:39 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > Also think about the performance that you're seeing right now. > > > > On first run, a CFMX page "compiles". The pages are no longer > interpreted > > on the fly. This means your initial "First Hit" is going to take a few > > seconds, but every request after this is going to much faster. > > > > It's a complaint we've seen on the forums, Ie, "I just installed, why > is > > the admin so slow" the answer is simple, the admin is compiling itself > for > > the first time. If you hit the admin after the first time, you'll note > > it's much snappier. > > > > The "initial compile" bump is being examined and worked on, but it > does > > not change the fact that the pages are being COMPILED, not interpreted > as > > presvious versions. > > > > As for Matt's comment about JSP, this should not be the case in the > end. I > > know I for one want CFMX to be as fast, and faster still, then CF5. > This > > is our goal. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:39 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > > > > > > > So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 > > > > people using CF at once on an intranet application, (I > > > > also use CF from a shared host) there is no advantage > > > > to going to MX? I'm still waiting for a great reason > > > > to upgrade to CF 5.0. > > > > > > Sure, there are lots of reasons! They're not necessarily performance > > > reasons, though: > > > > > > 1. The ability to publish and consume web services, > > > 2. Verity K2 (since you're not even on CF 5 yet) is much > > > faster than the > > > previous version of Verity, > > > 3. A working Advanced Security interface for developers > > > (Sandbox security), > > > 4. Charting, > > > 5. and much, much more! CFCs, UDFs (again, since you're not > > > on CF 5) ... > > > > > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > > > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > > voice: (202) 797-5496 > > > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
